Constraints are reviewed in separate files
Land, planning, environment, access, grid, survey and constructability inputs are compared manually with inconsistent versions.
From site and corridor evidence to accepted asset data
Keep land, access, grid connection, construction change and handover in one traceable data chain.
Geospatial Net supports solar, wind, energy storage and grid-connection programmes with site and corridor GIS, LiDAR and RTK data, utility and access mapping, construction evidence, automation, reporting and As-Built handover. We help technical teams control the information around engineering decisions without claiming regulated design authority that belongs elsewhere.
No polished brief required. Start with the corridor, asset data or workflow that is holding delivery back.
Where delivery loses control
Three recurring data and workflow problems.
The first project review confirms which issue is material, what evidence exists and who owns acceptance.
Construction change breaks the asset record
Cable routes, roads, drainage, structures, equipment and field evidence are not reconciled continuously.
Handover starts after commissioning pressure
Identifiers, schemas, documents and maintenance data are assembled late, when access to project knowledge is already shrinking.
Focused entry points
Start with a defined work package, not a broad transformation promise.
01Site and corridor GISOrganise land, access, survey, constraints, route options and project evidence around a controlled spatial model.02LiDAR, RTK and reality captureProcess terrain and asset evidence for planning, construction comparison, clearance or handover use cases.03Construction and As-Built dataReconcile approved field change, installed assets, documents and quality status into the target operating schema.04Portfolio reporting and automationStandardise project intake, validation, exceptions and spatial reporting across multiple sites or work packages.
What can be delivered
Technical outputs with explicit acceptance and ownership.
Final formats, accuracy, review roles and regulated responsibilities are agreed before production work scales.
- Site and corridor geodatabase with source register
- Terrain, access, asset and constraint-ready spatial layers
- Field capture, progress evidence and exception workflows
- Construction change and As-Built reconciliation
- Portfolio-level quality and delivery dashboards
- Final GIS, CAD, document and operating handover package
Who this can support
Owner, operator, programme and delivery teams.
Renewable-energy developers and asset ownersSolar, wind and storage EPC teamsGrid-connection and transmission programmesPlanning, environmental and engineering consultants
Professional boundaries
Evidence and implementation do not replace regulated authority.
Site selection, planning consent, electrical engineering, environmental approval and licensed survey outputs remain with the named qualified authorities. We support their work with controlled spatial inputs, implementation and data handover.
Common project questions
Clarify fit before committing to rollout.
These answers describe our normal delivery approach. Contract, access and jurisdiction requirements determine the final scope.
Can you support a portfolio rather than one site?
Yes. A shared schema, naming model, validation rules and reporting layer can make separate project packages comparable without hiding local requirements.
Can you work before detailed design is complete?
Yes. Early work can organise route, land, access, survey and constraint evidence while keeping assumptions and decision status explicit.
Can field and contractor submissions be standardised?
Yes. We can define templates, identifiers, mobile forms, import rules, quality checks and exception handling before rollout.
A low-risk first step
Bring one site, grid-connection corridor or handover package that needs a controlled spatial model.
Share one representative work package, dataset or stalled workflow. We will identify the missing inputs, acceptance gates and smallest pilot that can produce a useful decision.
Request a project review
Start with a focused scope. Agree the inputs, outputs and acceptance criteria before scaling.